I agree. This is why I've decided to go the Apple rout, because at least they 
care enough to give us a full-featured screen reader, very good TTS, and more 
stability than Windows ever had. I also love their email service, and 
everything else they provide. The only thing I miss from windows is MushZ, but 
gosh maybe Draconis can make an accessible MUD client.
Devin Prater
[email protected]



On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:14 AM, Draconis Entertainment 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Adding to what Tom says here,
> 
> Apple's business model is much different from Microsoft's. While you are 
> restricted to running OS X on Mac hardware, one of the reasons is because 
> Apple virtually gives away its OS. In a way, it is their own form of 
> registration. If you have Apple hardware, that gives you the license to run 
> the OS. OS X usually costs about $20, making it far more affordable than 
> something like Windows, and the vast majority of users will stay current.
> 
> There is, of course, the added benefit that, like game consoles, many mobile 
> devices, etc, by limiting the variations of hardware that the software may be 
> run on to a finite number, you can greatly improve stability. This is why Mac 
> OS X is so much more stable than just about anything else comparable out 
> there. (Microsoft is starting to take this approach with Windows Phone. It 
> limits the variations of hardware permitted by companies licensing the OS in 
> an attempt to improve consistency and stability.)
> 
> LIke most things in life, there are trade offs. I happen to prefer the trade 
> offs Apple has chosen to make over those of other platforms. And while OS X 
> itself is restricted in its use, the Darwin base upon which it is built is 
> open sourced. Apple has done an exemplary job of finding a balance between 
> commercial and open source.
> 
> On Jan 21, 2013, at 4:38 AM, Thomas Ward <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Shaun,
>> 
>> Well, here is the rub with that approach.
>> 
>> One, it is not legal to run Mac OS on none Apple hardware. that is to
>> say if a person installs Mac OS on an HP, Gateway, Del, whatever that
>> is a violation of the end user license agreement so isn't legal.
>> Assuming a person gets it running at all.
>> 
>> Two, Mac OS needs a genuine Intel processor. If a person like me is
>> running an AMD64 processor Mac OS won't run on the PC because it is
>> not a genuine Intel processor.. Its an AMD processor. So right there
>> anyone running AMD based PCs is screwed.
>> 
>> So while it is possible to get Mac OS up and running on a PC through a
>> virtual machine or running natively on the hardware its not that
>> simple and straight forward. Even if someone successfully overcomes
>> the hardware issues its not strictly legal since Apple has one of the
>> most restrictive end user license agreements around regarding how
>> their software is distributed and used on non-Apple approved hardware.
>> As a developer I couldn't legally use that approach myself.
> 
> 
> ---
> Gamers mailing list __ [email protected]
> If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to [email protected].
> You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
> http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
> All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected].
> If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
> please send E-mail to [email protected].


---
Gamers mailing list __ [email protected]
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to [email protected].
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected].
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to [email protected].

Reply via email to