On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 15:55 +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote: > On 6/1/11 12:10 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > The bylaws say that there should be "An assessment of the openness and > > transparency of the development process and its supporting > > infrastructure", but don't really describe sanctions. Currently there > > are a couple of proposals for infrastructure changes (bug database, > > code review framework) that are in danger of being implemented using > > closed proprietary code. > > "Openness of the supporting infrastructure" does not imply that the source > code for it must be open source.
Right, that is why there currently is a danger that is could be implemented using closed proprietary code. Which would be a bad thing for contributors. So we could fix that in the bylaws by making sure it does imply that. Thanks, Mark
