> So the sh4 failure in my tester is almost certainly unrelated to this patch.
> So I've pushed this version to the trunk. THanks for your patience. > For the future, please consider including testcases. There's numerous > folks that can help with that process. For this issue I would have > likely done a risc-v specific test because we can control things via > -mbranch-cost to verify that at a particular branch cost the 3 > conditional move sequence if-converts. Thanks for investigating the SH4 failure and pushing the patch to trunk. And I’ll add the corresponding test case as soon as possible. Best regards, Wang Jue
