On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 23:48 +0000, a r wrote: > On Jan 12, 2008 9:37 PM, a r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have found a bug in the logic of previously attached patch. New > > patch will follow soon but first I want to clean up it a bit more and > > test. > > I've attached an updated patch (sorry, again it's for v.1.3.0).
No problem whatsoever. There haven't been a great deal of changes since 1.3.0, and probably won't be until after 1.4.0 is released. > The > logic was changed to match the previously described behaviour. As far > as the placement algorithm is concerned, I am done with it. > > During testing I've got a SIGSEGV, which, as far as I can see, is not > directly related to my changes (although it is fairly possible that > these changes expose the error somehow). The best method to recreate > it is to switch the net drawing mode on and start clicking wildly on > the schematic. > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. The backtrace there is the same as I get eventually under gdb. I'll have a dig back in the history with git and see how far back the bug is reproducible. -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
