> In my opinion, the projects with highest priority are the ones > that address obvious reasons people don't use gEDA. > > With this in mind, I think the translators are the highest > priority. The need to hack files to move between our own tools > is a big turn-off. An overall project manager is important > too, but experienced users don't mind (or actually like) > separate tools. A GUI won't do any good if the file > translation isn't complete. We should be able to use the same > schematic for simulation and PC board.
Could the rest of the developers comment on this. I ask because I can code in C/C++ and if there is work that is *More*important for the project I could propose to do something else. I am comfortable with separate tools so I totally understand. The reason that I proposed to work on the Project Manager is because I currently make GUIs at work so I have a fairly good understanding of all the details that are involved in making one work. > > > This year, I would like to see us concentrate on making the > system work as a system, while keeping the flexibility of the > separate tools. > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev >
_______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
