On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:37:32 -0400, al davis wrote: > A concerned user of the system needing a port should participate in the > development process, (...) > gEDA is well supported on Debian because Hamish does that. gEDA is well > supported on Fedora because Chitlesh does that.
Doing a windows port is a lot more demanding than a package for some Linux Distro. Geda and friends are native to linux like systems. A windows version would be a port rather than a package. > We need someone to step up and do that for MS-Windows. How about you? I am not a user of the system needing a port. However, I have indeed considered to give it a try. But I haven't done anything comparable before. "Registry" sounds like marriage to me ;-) ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak http://lilalaser.de/blog _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
