2008/3/24, al davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > You should check the archives, back less than a month. There is > a thread "CSoC" and "GSoC 2008" where Newell Jensen is talking > about a "project manager". This is similar to what you are > proposing, more ambitious.
That's right. I just made a smaller and humble proposal because I took in account the amount of time I have (and I didn't know of Newells proposal). I didn't want to start something I knew I wouldn't be able to finish in time. Doing a project manager from scratch is a doomed task in my conditions. > In my opinion, the projects with highest priority are the ones > that address obvious reasons people don't use gEDA. I totally agree with you in this. I wanted to work in xgsch2pcb because most of my students prefer kicad and I know for sure they will start to use gEDA with just a little better xgsch2pcb. > With this in mind, I think the translators are the highest > priority. The need to hack files to move between our own tools > is a big turn-off. An overall project manager is important > too, but experienced users don't mind (or actually like) > separate tools. A GUI won't do any good if the file > translation isn't complete. We should be able to use the same > schematic for simulation and PC board. That's certainly right. cheers --- Adrian _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
