Maybe nesting the light component inside a heavy one is the solution?
Something like
C 42300 41300 1 0 0 7400-1.sym
{
C 44100 44900 1 0 0 nand-1.sym
T 44100 44900
device=74HC00
T 44100 44800
footprint=DIL14
...
}
>
> The one thing that bothers me about your abstract-symbols
> mechanism (yes I did try it a while ago) is that the end user has to
> instanciate two symbols instead of just one. From the example from the
> referenced post:
>
> ...
> C 44100 44900 1 0 0 nand-1.sym
> ...
>
> and
>
> ...
> C 42300 41300 1 0 0 7400-slots.sym
> ...
>
>
> That seems odd and I would have a hard time explaining that to
> end users. I like the idea of a "nand-1.sym" (yeah!), but I don't like
> the idea that you also have place a 7400-slots.sym. My approach will
> only require one instanciated component (nand-1.sym) which is "modified"
> (exactly how is what I'm currently working on) with the additional
> netlisting specific information.
>
> -Ales
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
Wojciech Kazubski
_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
