HasTSO is acceptable to me, but if we're looking for alternatives, we could do NeedsTSO instead (since in a sense the consistency model is a requirement the ISA puts on the memory system).
Steve On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Ali Saidi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > That is fine. I can see arguments both ways, but go for it. > > Ali > > > On 09.01.2012 18:30, Nilay Vaish wrote: > > > Ali, are you sure that 'an > ISA is total store order' is grammatically > > correct? I chose hasTSO on > purpose, since I feel 'an ISA has total store > > order' is correct. > > > > > -- > > Nilay > > > > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Ali Saidi wrote: > > > >> I'm neutral > on this, either way is fine, but I think the name HasTSO isn't ideal. An > ISA is TSO, but I don't know that it has TSO. Ali > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gem5-dev mailing > list > > [email protected] > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
