> On 2010-10-09 13:38:40, Gabe Black wrote:
> > src/cpu/simple/timing.cc, line 765
> > <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/256/diff/1/?file=3666#file3666line765>
> >
> >     Prefetch faults should ideally be surpressed at their source, not here. 
> > At the source we already implicitly know the instruction shouldn't fault. 
> > Here, we have to rediscover that all the time.
> 
> Ali Saidi wrote:
>     I don't agree. If you suppress this at the source the CPU model doesn't 
> know if it should actually try and issue the instruction, so that would have 
> to be checked some how. Additionally, in most cases there is one or two place 
> in the TLB that a correct translation is returned and as many places where a 
> fault is returned. Checking there would complication all of the code paths.

I don't follow your argument... shouldn't the prefetch get issued 
unconditionally?  If it doesn't have a valid translation then you don't want to 
send it to the cache, but the instruction itself still gets executed.

As far as implementing this, seems like there could be just one or two places 
after the TLB translation is returned where we override the fault if it's a 
prefetch, rather than pushing the override into the TLB itself.


- Steve


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/256/#review364
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2010-10-02 19:19:53, Ali Saidi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/256/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-10-02 19:19:53)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> ARM: Mark prefetches as such and allow timing CPU to handle them.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/arch/arm/faults.cc e78b6bba67ca 
>   src/arch/arm/isa/insts/ldr.isa e78b6bba67ca 
>   src/cpu/simple/timing.cc e78b6bba67ca 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/256/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ali
> 
>

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to