Hi, > I do believe that there is however a solution to this problem, but it > does not come for free either. Let the WGLC take place as it happens > right now, but move the Expert Reviews (a.k.a. Directorate Reviews) > also within the responsibility of the WG, after the WGLC completes. > This will make the WG cycle longer by a few weeks, but will allow for > the Directorate comments to be processed by the WG, but on a stable > version, which the WG considers as having passed the WGLC.
what Dan is proposing here is already happening to a certain extent in RAI, in particular in the XRBLOCK WG, which Dan cochairs. The chairs request Benoit's directorate to perform a review before they send the documents to me (i.e., before pub req). Cheers, Gonzalo _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
