> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 11:18 AM
> To: Brian E Carpenter
> Cc: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); General Area Review Team; Mary Barnes; The
> IESG
> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] timing of reviews
> 
> Dan, Brian,
> 
> > On 26/05/2013 20:57, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> > ...
> >> I do believe that there is however a solution to this problem, but it
> >> does not come for free either. Let the WGLC take place as it happens
> >> right now, but move the Expert Reviews (a.k.a. Directorate Reviews)
> >> also within the responsibility of the WG, after the WGLC completes.
> >
> > I think this would be a very good compromise - ask WG chairs to obtain
> > and respond to the cross-area reviews (including
> > Gen-ART) just before requesting AD review. This would mean we
> > reviewers would be looking at reasonably finished work as we do now,
> > and it should incent the WG to take notice of the reviews, and relieve
> > the AD to some extent too.
> >
> > Very good suggestion!
> 
> I agree. I like this model because it puts the chairs and the WG in
> charge. Thanks, Dan!
> 
> The other potentially helpful technique is to let the WG chairs have
> some room to decide when to ask for reviews. The chairs typically have
> some understanding of where their documents are in terms of readiness :-
> ) even when opening a last call. A complex, controversial document is
> probably better off first complete its round of WGLC(s) before giving it
> to directorates...
> 
> Jari

[[DR]] My experience is that WG chairs already feel that they have the room to 
ask for early directorate reviews for more complex documents - this is at least 
my experience with the MIB doctors reviews. These are considered however 'early 
reviews' according to the current process and they are an exception. If we go 
ahead with this proposal, we make of reviews performed after WGLC but before 
submission to the IESG the rule. 

Regards,

Dan

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to