Indeed. In the XRBLOCK WG we are actually soliciting both PMDIR and SDP Directorate reviews, and update the documents according to the directorate comments before submitting them to the IESG. So we can say that there is some runing code for this proposal.
Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Gonzalo Camarillo [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 10:42 AM > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > Cc: Mary Barnes; Jari Arkko; General Area Review Team; The IESG > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] timing of reviews > > Hi, > > > I do believe that there is however a solution to this problem, but it > > does not come for free either. Let the WGLC take place as it happens > > right now, but move the Expert Reviews (a.k.a. Directorate Reviews) > > also within the responsibility of the WG, after the WGLC completes. > > This will make the WG cycle longer by a few weeks, but will allow for > > the Directorate comments to be processed by the WG, but on a stable > > version, which the WG considers as having passed the WGLC. > > what Dan is proposing here is already happening to a certain extent in > RAI, in particular in the XRBLOCK WG, which Dan cochairs. The chairs > request Benoit's directorate to perform a review before they send the > documents to me (i.e., before pub req). > > Cheers, > > Gonzalo _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
