Dan, Brian, > On 26/05/2013 20:57, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > ... >> I do believe that there is however a solution to this >> problem, but it does not come for free either. Let the WGLC >> take place as it happens right now, but move the Expert >> Reviews (a.k.a. Directorate Reviews) also within the >> responsibility of the WG, after the WGLC completes. > > I think this would be a very good compromise - ask WG chairs > to obtain and respond to the cross-area reviews (including > Gen-ART) just before requesting AD review. This would mean > we reviewers would be looking at reasonably finished work > as we do now, and it should incent the WG to take notice of > the reviews, and relieve the AD to some extent too. > > Very good suggestion!
I agree. I like this model because it puts the chairs and the WG in charge. Thanks, Dan! The other potentially helpful technique is to let the WG chairs have some room to decide when to ask for reviews. The chairs typically have some understanding of where their documents are in terms of readiness :-) even when opening a last call. A complex, controversial document is probably better off first complete its round of WGLC(s) before giving it to directorates... Jari _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
