Brian McCallister wrote:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Could you clarify whether you are asking if the Glasgow project could
continue in a different direction from the spec, or whether the spec,
itself, could be changed/forked and distributed by the ASF?
If something were to happen to cause development to stop on the spec,
the licensing terms were to change, etc, could folks (including
Glasgow) basically use the last released version as a starting point
for continued protocol development,
- yes
or would the licensing terms (and grants of rights specifically tied
to use of this protocol based on this document) force the project and
existing users to throw things away and develop something new which
would not infringe.
-Brian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]