----- Original Message -----
From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: lists that don't require subscriber approval
> "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You're right. The name [EMAIL PROTECTED] was the
voted
> > name. I seem to remember that the list name was changed at the last
minute
> > to be cactus-user@... because there was the intention to make Cactus a
root
> > project in the future and a name change being a major change it was
> > preferred to name right away cactus-user@...
>
> And making a hell-of-confusion :) Joking, of course... I tend to agree
with
> Brian and with the "guidelines" he gave when we opened the new subprojects
> (back in 99, I believe)... It's just that since (now) cactus is not a
> top-level project, it shouldn't have a top level Mailing List, but it
should
> be always be prepended by the name of the project in which it resides...
>
I also agree. It was a mistake and I apologize for that. Please forgive me
... I promise not to do it again ... :-)
> > However, you're right and I don't think it was done in a orderly manner
and I
> > don't remember any voting on the subject.
>
> I believe that, if you developers want to be a "real" root-level project,
> well, you have all the right to be... Did you have a vote on the commons
> mailing list to "split out" ??? :)
just sent a request for vote now on [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
:)
>
> > Maybe now is the right time to vote for making Cactus a top level
project ?
> > Are there conditions for that (like number of hits,downloads, community)
?
> > Who decides, PMC members ?
>
> Once the developers agree that they want to become top level, I believe
that
> it's only a matter of PMC "blessing" of that... I would be +1...
>
Thanks.
> Pier
-Vincent
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
