On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 12:30, Jason van Zyl wrote: > On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 11:57, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > This issue has come up before. This time, let's flatten it. > > > > In two weeks, there is a board meeting. At that time, I would like to > > be able to report that the contents of the Maven repository conforms to > > the policies of the Apache Software Foundation. > > > > Code under the ASF License is clearly OK. As is the IBM Public License > > (the pre-Jakarta BSF, for example) and the MPL (Rhino). The following > > public domain components are also approved: Antlr and Doug Lea's > > concurrency package. > > > > Licenses clearly not conforming to the ASF's policies for distribution: > > LGPL, GPL, Sun's Binary Code License. > > The Sun Binary Code License issue I am looking into personally and will > either 1) add a click through license handler 2) Add the > non-distributable JARs feature back in or 3) remove them. These are a > problem. >
I've removed the JAF, JavaMail and EJB jars from the repository. Sam, just let know if there are others JARs I can remove to make it more difficult for people to build their projects. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
