> It should be noted that Apache Software Foundation members > are the legal > *owners* of the software that is available under the Apache > Software License. Indeed, that is one of the key benefits to > becoming an ASF member, as opposed to just a committer on one > or more projects. It seems perfectly reasonable that > decisions on the license under which that software is > licensed should be made by the people that own it.
I'm curious. What is the legal basis for this claim of ownership? /Larry Rosen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
