On Dec 21, 2003, at 9:20 PM, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 09:09:34PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:I think that there is nothing wrong with the PMC having a private list
and discussing things there, especially when we're discussing trying to
make that group bigger. I'm sure that Andrew doesn't really either.
That is not the kind of ASF that I want to see.
It seems we have gone from one extreme to the other: first we have everything in the public and now we want everything to be private?
That's not at all what I said.
Why not a happy medium? If it's sensitive, discuss it on the PMC. If not, discuss it on the dev/general list.
I think you are confusing this with httpd. There is no one dev list, thank goodness. I agree that sensitive things should be on the PMC list, and non-sensitive things should be on the general@ list.
I think that specific tactics for restructuring can be considered sensitive from the POV of it not being some 'state secret', as Andy seems to want people to believe, but rather because of the confusion that it sews. My hope was for us to get our act together before we approached the rest of the community, and do it as a group.
No decisions were made on the PMC list, and the majority of the chatter was 'what do we do?'.
geir
-- Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
