On 5/21/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But to recap, we had 1/ Open-up Jakarta to all committers, was vetoed 2/ Merge commons into Jakarta, was vetoed 3/ Move commons into own TLP, was vetoed
Each of those proposals could be voted down, but are not subject to veto. In other words, a -1 expressed in such a vote is just a -1, not a veto.
Any Jakarta project that feels uneasy because it - has an isolated community - has a broader scope than "Java" should consider a TLP
+1 - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
