The pax runner format with . was there because by the time that we had
the artifacts in ops4j repository equinox was not available on maven
central repo.
Actually I do not think that they have an "official" maven repository
(it would be really good if they had that).
Now, if you look at the download page of equinox you will find out
that the artifacts are named with "." as in
org.eclipse.osgi.util_3.1.200.v20070605.jar.
I cannot say which one is good but I would keep for now the old naming
with a "." as people already have them like that and by changing the
name pax runner will re-download them.
I'm willing to change all of this naming as soon as there is an
official up to date repository of equinox artifacts.
Alin
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Hendy Irawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just committed in OPS4J in pax-runner platform equinox regarding the
> version separator
>
> i.e. 3.1.200-v20070605 instead of 3.1.200.v20070605 that pax-runner was
> using
>
> However, I can only do that for osgi.services and osgi.util, since I'm not
> sure where the new Equinox lives (it's official Maven repo for new drops).
>
> i.e. which one is correct:
>
> 3.3.2-R33x_v20080105
> 3.3.2-R33x.v20080105
> 3.3.2-R33x-v20080105
>
> and where it should live? (in OPS4J Maven repo?)
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Hendy Irawan
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
--
Alin Dreghiciu
http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
Participation Software.
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development.
http://malaysia.jayway.net - New Energy for Projects - Great People
working on Great Projects at Great Places
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
