On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Peter Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there, > > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Hendy Irawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Wouldn't it be natural to suggest Orbit maintainers to use a Maven > > compatible repository structure? > > > What do you guys think? I guess Orbit should be a natural place to host > > Equinox itself and Equinox-related bundles right? (i.e. pseudo-"certified > > for Equinox" stuff) > Yes, true, > who is taking contact? If you want to put some force behind this, go > ahead, it would be great to have a good repo to build against! > > /peter You interested? :) Before that, I foresee one problem. Equinox guys definitely have a interest of making repositories compatible with Eclipse update site conventions, and that's (?) incompatible with Maven's.... > > -- > GTalk: neubauer.peter > Skype peter.neubauer > ICQ 18762544 > GTalk neubauer.peter > Phone +46704 106975 > LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer > > http://www.neo4j.org - New Energy for Data - the Graph Database. > http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open > Participation Software. > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- Best regards, Hendy Irawan
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
