Hi there, On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Hendy Irawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wouldn't it be natural to suggest Orbit maintainers to use a Maven > compatible repository structure?
> What do you guys think? I guess Orbit should be a natural place to host > Equinox itself and Equinox-related bundles right? (i.e. pseudo-"certified > for Equinox" stuff) Yes, true, who is taking contact? If you want to put some force behind this, go ahead, it would be great to have a good repo to build against! /peter -- GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer ICQ 18762544 GTalk neubauer.peter Phone +46704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer http://www.neo4j.org - New Energy for Data - the Graph Database. http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
