On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 29 May 2008 01:00, Alin Dreghiciu wrote: > > Or, Niclas you were talking about why Equinox choose to name their > > artifacts with a "." in the first place? > > I can't recall. > It could be one or more of many things; > > * OSGi versioning rules. > * Maven undefined behavior with versions. > * Equinox itself, past and present. > * Eclipse > * PDE > * Original Pax Runner > > > Cheers > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > Which reminds me of SpringSource Enterprise Repository. Their bundles are not just OSGi compliant, but they also make sure that: - artifact name (for Maven) - JAR name (for Maven with regard to repository layout) - OSGi version (for OSGi) are consistent. Consistent that they pay consideration to the artifact name so that it is OK stand-alone (you won't see cm-x.x.x.jar, what is it??) and maven artifact versions are automatically OSGi-compliant with regard to both the JAR version name and OSGi bundle version. I hope Costin would be willing to confirm my assumption. -- Best regards, Hendy Irawan
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
