-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jason Stubbs wrote:
| I don't quite get you here. GLEP 31 has been approved, no? That would
make
| it seem to me that the above suggestion is just making the QA tool help
| enforce existing policy. If there's a flaw in that line of thinking,
please
| point it out in case I fall into the same trap in some other instance.

OK, here's your flaw. glep.gentoo.org says it's withdrawn.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDA9K6XVaO67S1rtsRAgr/AJ9rcYfnNs+2Lq1R15+YCVKmpV6bZwCgsWK0
cGOBwYM7LW/Owfu10CmqErA=
=cWiz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to