Jason Stubbs wrote:     [Wed Aug 17 2005, 08:09:39PM EDT]
> I don't quite get you here. GLEP 31 has been approved, no? That
> would make it seem to me that the above suggestion is just making
> the QA tool help enforce existing policy. If there's a flaw in that
> line of thinking, please point it out in case I fall into the same
> trap in some other instance.

You might be right.  I wasn't aware that GLEP 31 was approved before
it was withdrawn.


Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer

Attachment: pgp2qJCbzyyD7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to