On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:25:34 +0100 Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:51:25AM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > There is currently no explanation as to why this GLEP should be | > chosen over ChrisWhite's 42. I will add such a section if anyone | > requests it. | Any reason why you chose bashing Chris' GLEP in another mail and start | your own instead of working together and bringing your input for 42?
Yup. I already had most of my GLEP written, and I don't see anything in ChrisWhite's list of vagueness worth using. Besides, there's nothing wrong with multiple competing GLEPs on an issue. | I miss references to the old log ewarn issue, which really should be | solved as well while we're at it. Separate concern. | There are some good ideas in your GLEP, so are some in Chris'. No good | is coming from having two similar GLEPs around at the same | time. So please don't waste our time [1] by having two more or less | redundant GLEPs discussed. It's my view that ChrisWhite's GLEP is a complete waste of space, given that it doesn't contain an actual proposal. I see no point in using it. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgpFw7VJjtZdT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
