On Monday 14 of January 2008 02:24:53 Mark Loeser wrote: > Here is a newer revision of the GLEP. I still have multiple methods of > solving this problem (mostly because I want and *need* input from people > as to what they would prefer). Please tell me what you would want to > use so I can come up with a more precise specification. What exactly do > we need this system to do that we can't do now? Is overriding the USE > flag with use.local.desc sufficient and we just need to document the > current solution properly? > > Please...let me know how you feel about this.
Tbh, I don't have any issues with the current solution, but I may be missing something. "Rationale" doesn't seem to help though, afaics it is just saying that the current behaviour needs to be documented and fwiw PMS draft covers this already: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spb/pms.pdf - section 3.4.3 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/gleps/glep-0054.html Please, don't use an already assigned GLEP number, it's a bit confusing. Note that 55 is taken as well. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list