Sebastian Pipping posted on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:21:49 +0200 as excerpted:

> However I do notice that "GPL-2+" could make things easier. Why not
> introduce a license group for it like @GPL-2+ or so, instead? That would
> be transparent and use existing means.

I've always thought Gentoo needed "plus" versions of the versioned 
licenses, anyway.  GPL-2, GPL-2+, GPL-3, and GPL-3+, should all be 
different licenses, because really, they are.

Then again, there's the various "waiver" conditions, which I /do/ see are 
covered with separate licenses for many of them, already.

But someone already mentioned a license audit, which in practical terms 
would be needed to really depend on the LICENSE variable in any case.

Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

Reply via email to