-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 30 May 2013 09:54:38 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30/05/13 02:46 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Wed, 29 May 2013 19:22:32 -0500 William Hubbs > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We could probably also turn gcc-config into an eselect module if > >> we want to use that argument. > > > > Someone did, but unfortunately gcc-config is a big pile of poorly > > understood voodoo, so eclectic gcc ended up being abandoned. > > > > The eselect-gcc wrapper was almost an alias though, wasn't it? ie, it > just called gcc-config underneath?
At least one of the eselect gcc implementations was "from scratch". > Is there interest in reviving this? All of our documentation has > discussed using gcc-config directly for so long, i'm not sure if > there'd be that much adoption... It would be good, in the name of consistency. It would also be a great opportunity to fix Gentoo's unique inability to have multiple libstdc++ versions usable simultaneously. - -- Ciaran McCreesh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlGoQYgACgkQ96zL6DUtXhH69QCgseYybgvnYUyTJNBCrnQvyf3t XbkAnik/suBWNyQp6D919WqGmWc+3EeG =msFd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
