On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 01:26:51PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 12:44:11 -0500
> William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Yes I would benefit from this change, but it is not a case of optimizing
> > for one. It is a case of opening up the use of the wiki to the largest
> > audiance possible. This is just good universal design.
> Unfortunately,  my experience with wiki's indicates that's not really an
> option we have.
> There are lots of different formats, sure, but lots of those formats
> reduce to being restrictive, declarative formats, where "content" is
> stuffed into a range of formats predefined in the markups syntax.
> This ultimately ends up *restricting* the range of *visual* tools at
> our disposal for distinguishing details on a case-by-case basis, by
> forcing all details to adhere to a universally simplified scheme.
> While I do appreciate the difficulty presented to people with
> sight-impairment, I'd opt primarily for choices that help them
> *without* compromising the range of options we have for visual
> distinguishers.

That's the whole point of the discussion.
Have you even looked at gollum for example? it can support mw markdown.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to