> On 5 Jul 2022, at 00:49, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 7:21 PM Robin H. Johnson <robb...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> It had 3 states however: >> a) go ahead and touch it, no additional approvals needed >> b) please get a maintainer to approve it >> c) do not touch it >> > > ++ > > Though to be fair b is really no different from what just about > anybody can do via a pull request. I don't think most maintainers are > going to be hovering between a vs c. I suspect most are going to be > divided between a vs b. I guess I could see an argument for c if some > package is really finicky and tends to get a lot of repetitive > requests for changes that won't work for reasons that might not be > obvious, but I'm not sure if that is really a concern. >
Right. Difference between b and c might make more sense if c became "run it by another developer as a sanity-check" (who is not necessarily a maintainer of the package, or obviously there's pretty much no point). > -- > Rich Best, sam
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
