On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Justin Deoliveira<[email protected]> wrote:
> <snip>
>>
>> I don't think that this way of producing docs would work at least not for us.
>> 1> Working with the wiki is a real pain
>> 2> We often use more than on computer for our work, hence we need to
>> make use of svn
>> 3> Documentation time is expensive, we cannot afford writing on the
>> wiki and maintaining patches. I don't wish to put our private svn in
>> the loop.
>
> Excellent points.
>
>>
>> Therefore, simple suggestion, we should think about a scheme where the
>> docs get committed to svn right away and then moved into
>> "production-ready" documentation once a formal review has been made (I
>> would add between N days).
>> This would make everyone happy I guess.
> Well branching would be the obvious answer with our current system.
> Although doing a full branch for working on docs is a bit of overkill.

I agree, overkill...

>
> Another alternative could be to have a "pending" space. This could be
> more of a "scratch pad" type place where wiki type style writing can
> take place, at the same time having the docs integrated. Although
> pending docs would not be considered part of the finished product and
> stripped out of the doc artifacts when they are built.

This is exactly what I have in mind. Write the doc then ask for review
when you are ready.

>
> A third answer is dsvc.

This is more a proposal than an answer :-)


I would say that 1 would work for the moment, 3 could be next step.


Ciao
Simone.
>>
>>
>> Ciao,
>> Simone.
>>
>>
>>> 2c,
>>>
>>> -Justin
>>>
>>> Mike Pumphrey wrote:
>>>> I don't think the idea was abandoned, but I also don't think it was 
>>>> adopted as dogma.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a section I should take a look at and/or go in with my vacuum 
>>>> cleaner?  :)  Just let me know...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mike Pumphrey
>>>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Apologies if I missed something while I was away but I thought before we
>>>>> more or less agreed that we would adopt Mike as the user guide doc
>>>>> maintainer and that non-trivial changes should go through him via patches?
>>>>>
>>>>> Did we abandon that as a bad idea?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Justin
>>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
>>>> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus 
>>>> on
>>>> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
>>>> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>>
>>> --
>>> Justin Deoliveira
>>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>>> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
>>> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus 
>>> on
>>> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
>>> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>>
>
>
> --
> Justin Deoliveira
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to