On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Simone Giannecchini<[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Justin Deoliveira<[email protected]> wrote: >> <snip> >>> >>> I don't think that this way of producing docs would work at least not for >>> us. >>> 1> Working with the wiki is a real pain >>> 2> We often use more than on computer for our work, hence we need to >>> make use of svn >>> 3> Documentation time is expensive, we cannot afford writing on the >>> wiki and maintaining patches. I don't wish to put our private svn in >>> the loop. >> >> Excellent points. >> >>> >>> Therefore, simple suggestion, we should think about a scheme where the >>> docs get committed to svn right away and then moved into >>> "production-ready" documentation once a formal review has been made (I >>> would add between N days). >>> This would make everyone happy I guess. >> Well branching would be the obvious answer with our current system. >> Although doing a full branch for working on docs is a bit of overkill. > > I agree, overkill... > >> >> Another alternative could be to have a "pending" space. This could be >> more of a "scratch pad" type place where wiki type style writing can >> take place, at the same time having the docs integrated. Although >> pending docs would not be considered part of the finished product and >> stripped out of the doc artifacts when they are built. > > This is exactly what I have in mind. Write the doc then ask for review > when you are ready. > >> >> A third answer is dsvc. > > This is more a proposal than an answer :-) > > > I would say that 1 would work for the moment, 3 could be next step.
Ops, correcting myself, *2* would work, 3 could be next step. Simone. > > > Ciao > Simone. >>> >>> >>> Ciao, >>> Simone. >>> >>> >>>> 2c, >>>> >>>> -Justin >>>> >>>> Mike Pumphrey wrote: >>>>> I don't think the idea was abandoned, but I also don't think it was >>>>> adopted as dogma. >>>>> >>>>> Is there a section I should take a look at and/or go in with my vacuum >>>>> cleaner? :) Just let me know... >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Mike Pumphrey >>>>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Justin Deoliveira wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Apologies if I missed something while I was away but I thought before we >>>>>> more or less agreed that we would adopt Mike as the user guide doc >>>>>> maintainer and that non-trivial changes should go through him via >>>>>> patches? >>>>>> >>>>>> Did we abandon that as a bad idea? >>>>>> >>>>>> -Justin >>>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 >>>>> 30-Day >>>>> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and >>>>> focus on >>>>> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >>>>> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Geoserver-devel mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Justin Deoliveira >>>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org >>>> Enterprise support for open source geospatial. >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day >>>> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus >>>> on >>>> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >>>> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Geoserver-devel mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >>>> >> >> >> -- >> Justin Deoliveira >> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org >> Enterprise support for open source geospatial. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> _______________________________________________ >> Geoserver-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
