On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Peter Schrammel wrote:
> deprogrammer wrote:
>
> > > Should I commit Texinfo, HTML, and text formats to CVS? (They are
> > > automatically generated ...)
> > >
> >
> > Why not?, the more formats the documentation is in the easier it will be
> > for the users to view it in their prefered format.
> >
>
> IMHO only sources should go into cvs. SGML/XML is a source format.
> Everything that can be derived from that shouldn't go into cvs (or would
> you commit binaries into cvs?). But the different formats of
> documentation should be put onto the server for download. Btw checking
> out the cvs tree would take more time, traffic, phonebill....
Agree partly with you. SGML/XML docs should go into the libggi/libgii tarballs.
All other formats should be an option to download.
CU,
Christoph Egger
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
