Christoph Egger wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, James Simmons wrote:
> 
> > > It seems, that the time comes, where KGI can go into the kernel, no?
> >
> > I doubt it. Linus doesn't even like fbcon nor does he like the current
> > input suite. Trust me I have had long discussion about this with him. It
> > toke alot of pressure from several kernel developers to make sure these
> > things stayed. Their is alot of politics unfortunely. The good news is the
> > new console system I'm working on has alot of support from several key
> > kernel developers.
> 
> That's great. But I don't hope, that this work will result into a
> "rewrite" of the KGI-system, which means a lot of double work...
>
> When this should ever happen, then I don't understand, why KGI won't go in
> instead...

or EvStack...

<reflections>

Neither would I, but who cares?

Politics, lobbying, call it what you like to call it; my suspicion is you
can't understand it with rational thinking. I tried for four years and
gave up (thinking on this issue) with no result. However, coding continues,
and if it is for my personal fun and education only.

This brings one of Linus' latest statements up to my mind: "What Linux-users do
is never wrong." But obviously, if they do the badly needed rewrite of the
console system, and put graphics drivers partly where they belong to given 
the Linux architecture as a monolitic kernel OS -- into the Linux-kernel --
they are wrong?? Every computer would have a total crash here -- totally
contadicting information.

I am back coding,

                        Steffen

PS: my favourite song related to this issue:

        If you miss me in the back of the bus,
        you'll find me nowhere,
        ooohh-ohh-oohh,
        come on over to KGI,
        I'll be codin' right there...

Sung to the tune of "If you miss me in the back of the bus" performed by
Pete Seeger...

</reflections>
_______________________________________________________________________________
Steffen Seeger                              mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to