On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 21:41:03 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> said: >There is cvs, so knowledge about "HEAD doesn't work, try last week's >version" will spread soon through developer circles. This qualifies as one of the worst excuses I've heard yet. If you have to use a "development" version at least pick a fixed point in development and use that. Otherwise you're coding to not one, but two moving targets: your own code PLUS the moving code in the library you depend on. Or, in this case, five. If your goal is to make development as chaotic and difficult as possible, you are on the right track. Kelly _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Adam D. Moss
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Kelly Martin
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Michael Natterer
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Adam D. Moss
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Hans Breuer
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Kelly Martin
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Adam D. Moss
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Nick Lamb
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port pcg
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Kelly Martin
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port pcg
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Kelly Martin
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Lourens Veen
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Kelly Martin
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port pcg
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Kelly Martin
- Re: [Gimp-developer] glib/gtk+ 2.0 port Michael Natterer
