On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 03:48:20PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ayose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > <plugin>
> > <name>AlienMap</name>
> > <author>
> > <name>Daniel Cotting</name>
> > <email>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</email>
> > <homepage>http://www.mygale.org/~cotting</homepage>
> > </author>
> > <maintainer>
> > <!-- There is no a maintainer, but the structure will be the same that
> > author -->
> > </maintainer>
> > <files amount="1">
> > <size scale="kB">74.0</size>
> > <comment>only C files counted</comment>
> > </files>
> > <comment><!-- blank --></comment>
> > </plugin>
>
> would it make sense to organize the file by persons instead of
> plug-ins? I have no strong feelings either way but I think it should
> be considered at least.
By persons? No... With that format the plugins are described inside
<plugin>, and every plugin is led by <name>, so the file is organized
by plug-ins. Where are you seeing that the organize is by persons?
My english is not very good, so if I didn't explain it correctly,
please, notice me :)
>
> > If you need help with a XSLT I will help you pleased :-)
>
> we will most likely need at least one XLST that extracts a much
> simpler format to be used in the About dialog.
How "simpler"? Something like
name, author (email), comments
--
Ayose Cazorla Le�n
Debian GNU/Linux - setepo
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
