<[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes:
> Well, all the agruments I see in favour of 2.0 are always of the form
> "well, evereybody else has 2.0". Well, gtk+2 is at 2.2, msoffice is at
> 2003 etc..
I give shit on msoffice but GTK+ is the GIMP ToolKit and we will have
a hard time to explain why even it's major release numbers diverge.
> Frankly, I won't be oposed very much to calling it gimp-2.0, but
> everybody is expecting some _major_ release for 2.0, and 1.2 => 2.0,
> while having many enhancements, is not, in my opinion, much bigger
> than the 1.0 => 1.2 jump.
You obviously didn't look at the code. Frankly, the libgimp API hasn't
changed much but that's probably a good thing t'since it means that it
is easy to migrate plug-ins and scripts. Apart from libgimp and some
basic core functionality, the whole thing has been completely
Gimp-developer mailing list