On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:58:06AM +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "well, evereybody else has 2.0". Well, gtk+2 is at 2.2, msoffice is at
> > 2003 etc..
> I give shit on msoffice but GTK+ is the GIMP ToolKit and we will have
> a hard time to explain why even it's major release numbers diverge.
Pardon? Why would you ever have a problem explaining why version numbers
of *different* packages *differ*?
You don't even have a problem of explaining why version numbers for single
files differ, even less so for different packages.
That GTK+ is the GIMP ToolKit is not at all of any concern, after all,
gimp is the minority of applications using it. GTK+ has evolved. IF you
want to tie the version numbers, better make it a single package.
> You obviously didn't look at the code.
You obviously haven't read my mail. Really, I don't see why you are so
pissed off... I don't need to look at the code to see that there are no
major changes, and certainly none of the changes planned for 2.0 for a
> is easy to migrate plug-ins and scripts. Apart from libgimp and some
> basic core functionality, the whole thing has been completely
Well, if that would be all, then there would be no reason to upgrade for
users at all, as nothing has changed for them.
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
Gimp-developer mailing list