Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > I keep master copies untouched and rely on applications to show the
> > implied rotation.
> 
> You are aware that there's absolutely no good reason to do that?
> Rotation of JPEG images using exiftran or jpegtran is a lossless
> operation.

iff the width and height is a multiple of 8 or 16 pixels (which usually is
true for photos).

jpegtran keeps the data intact for non-8-multiples but then the visible
result is not exactly the expected rotation.

Bye,
        Simon
-- 
              [EMAIL PROTECTED]              http://simon.budig.de/
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Reply via email to