On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 01:20 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> I consider this both sad and grave. IMHO, the build of python-fu by
> default, and support for it under Redmond OS is one of the greatest
> things in this development cycle.
Huh? I never suggested that the build of Python-Fu should be disabled or
anything like that. I am only suggesting that it doesn't install any of
its example plug-ins that don't serve any particular purpose but being
examples for plug-in authors. Such plug-ins can very well be in the
source tree, but they must not show up in the menus.
> I will undertake i18n of the python-fu then, with no delays.
It's a bit late now to add another translation domain. I think this
should wait for 2.6.
> What else
> do you consider important for the UI to have for it to keep up with
> gimp standards?
Have a look at one of the Python-Fu dialog windows. Any further
Gimp-developer mailing list