Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
> If code like this is unstable or "in development" it needs to be labeled
> clearly as such and not simply toss out the old tried and tested.
The whole 2.3 branch is unstable and in development...
> It could easily have been implemented alongside the old tool without loosing
> much.
> I am using (as in productive use) the development branch of GIMP because of
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
... that's why it is called the development branch, after all.
> I need the current CVS for some of the functionality but at the same time
> the new rect selection is close of driving me nuts.
And this is why you did file the bug reports. One of the things I can't
understand is why you do double your work by posting the same
information here twice (and in a way that is very hard to read, btw -
please use empty lines to split your messages into paragraphs).
HTH,
Michael
--
GIMP > http://www.gimp.org | IRC: irc://irc.gimp.org/gimp
Wiki > http://wiki.gimp.org | .de: http://gimpforum.de
Plug-ins > http://registry.gimp.org |
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
