Scripsit "David Gowers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 8/30/06, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>   I'm not sure I can see what you're getting at, but are you suggesting
>   that I use a seperate layer for each color? That would make any kind
>   of editing extremely painful.

> When I saw it, I thought so too.
> However, remember this is GEGL being discussed here. *GIMP* might well
> provide a way to back-propagate the result of an Op in the graph, which
> should take care of this okay.

If it's just an implementation detail, I don't care, of course. But I
have difficulty imagining how this setup would be easier to code than
a single actual layer whose pixel colors are simply constrained to
those of the colormap.

Henning Makholm     Science, by its nature, is an uncertain undertaking, and
                  offers plenty of opportunity for failure no matter how you
             approach it. Yet among the myriad ways to get nowhere, the only
         fully reliable one is doing and thinking the same as everyone else.
Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to