Re: Re: Tile Cache Size

[Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero]

>I rather think _you_ are missing the point (which is disk layout and
>minimizing seeks, and _not_ a better memory layout. The tile based scheme
>leads itself naturally to spatial indexing, in fatc it's already half the
>way to go).

About HD: is there a way to do swap on demand to a partition? A daemon, lib
or something? I think that is what high end DBs do, handle their own data
physical space.

Just and idea based in what I have heard. Discard at will.

GSR