On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Andrew Kieschnick wrote: > Hmm. Are you setting the tile cache size to something reasonable? It will > definitely suck with the default 10mb tile cache... > Bumped it up to 60MB and it's better. Something as simple has hiding one of the layers takes about 10 seconds to complete. (Took about 20-30secs before I think). Or moving a rectangular region of one layer (which should affect only the union of the pixels under the src and dest rectangles?) takes about 10 seconds too. (Again, was probably almost 20 seconds before increasing the tile cache size). -Dave
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Tim Mooney
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Marc Lehmann
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Tim Mooney
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Austin Donnelly
- Re: Tile Cache Size Garrett LeSage
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Marc Lehmann
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Marc Lehmann
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Ewald R. de Wit
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size David Bonnell
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Andrew Kieschnick
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size David Bonnell
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Tuomas Kuosmanen
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Nick Lamb
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Ewald R. de Wit
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Nick Lamb
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Tuomas Kuosmanen
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Marc Lehmann
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Ewald R. de Wit
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Marc Lehmann
- Re: Tile Cache Size Eduardo Perez
- Re: Tile Cache Size Ewald R. de Wit