Further to my last post (and possibly related to Ewald's complaints too) Why does my 7274 x 9985 RGB image (212743Kb of data by my calculations) result in the creation of a gimpswap which is up to 500Mb in size? The performance for such images seems adequate to me (can't compare PotatoShop because it refuses to load any of our larger images at all) but this is wasting a lot of active disk space :( Nick.
- Re: Tile Cache Size Garrett LeSage
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Marc Lehmann
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Marc Lehmann
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Ewald R. de Wit
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size David Bonnell
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Andrew Kieschnick
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size David Bonnell
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Tuomas Kuosmanen
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Nick Lamb
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Ewald R. de Wit
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Nick Lamb
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Tuomas Kuosmanen
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Marc Lehmann
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Ewald R. de Wit
- Re: Re: Tile Cache Size Marc Lehmann
- Re: Tile Cache Size Eduardo Perez
- Re: Tile Cache Size Ewald R. de Wit
- Re: Tile Cache Size Nick Lamb
- Re: Tile Cache Size Ewald R. de Wit
- Re: Tile Cache Size Nick Lamb
- Re: Tile Cache Size Marc Lehmann