On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 19:18:53 -0500, Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >And yes, I agree with Michael also that 2002 is not a reasonable >target for the next stable release of the Gimp. Target dates are impossible to stick to. I offered 2002 because it took two years to go from 1.0 to 1.2. :) Kelly
- Plugins at Sourceforge Garry R. Osgood
- Re: Plugins at Sourceforge Marc Lehmann
- Re: Plugins at Sourceforge Zach Beane - MINT
- Re: Plugins at Sourceforge Glyph Lefkowitz
- Re: Plugins at Sourceforge Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: Plugins at Sourceforge Michael J. Hammel
- Re: Plugins at Sourceforge Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: Plugins at Sourceforge Michael J. Hammel
- Re: Plugins at Sourceforge Robert L Krawitz
- Re: Plugins at Sourceforge Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: Plugins at Sourceforge Marc Lehmann
- Re: Plugins at Sourceforge Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: Plugins at Sourceforge Marc Lehmann
- Re: Plugins at Sourceforge Daniel . Egger
- Plug-In manag(er|ing) Marc Lehmann
- Re: Plug-In manag(er|ing) Nils Philippsen
- Re: Plug-In manag(er|ing) Juergen A. Erhard
- Re: Plug-In manag(er|ing) Marc Lehmann
- Re: Plug-In manag(er|ing) Daniel . Egger
- installing .po files in ad... Marc Lehmann
