On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 01:52:39AM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 03:09:15PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> > 3) In case of a replacement, I found it useful to let the old section be
> > accessible by web. Now there is a bug in the site, see by yourself:
> > 
> > http://docs.gimp.org
> > 
> > - there is no direct links to the on line HTML 2.6 section, there is
> > only the 2.4 and older and the new WIP 2.8. The 2.6 version _is_ accessible 
> > but
> > only manually editing the web address of your browser replacing the 
> > 2.8 like
> > 
> > http://docs.gimp.org/2.8/en/
> > 
> > into
> > 
> > http://docs.gimp.org/2.6/en/
> > 
> > 4) is the web site version controlled? Why not?
> > 
> > it's enough for now...
> 
> Anyone has an answer?

Gosh, it is my destiny to look like a fool...

I see, the site is git controlled inside the gimp manual source...

Ok I can now reformulate che questions:

1) why in the GIMP manual site there are two series of links, one for
2.6.0, and one for 2.6.1? Why not preserving just the last?

2) why there are links to the online html pages for 2.4 but no links to the 2.6?

3) why not insert the links to the online html pages for 2.6?

4) if I do these changes, is there anyone who does not agree?

bye

-- 


Marco Ciampa

+--------------------+
| Linux User  #78271 |
| FSFE fellow   #364 |
+--------------------+
_______________________________________________
gimp-docs-list mailing list
gimp-docs-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list

Reply via email to