On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote: >> ...the discussion that isn't supposed to be happening anyway, given the > >> already explained status quo, which is: we will neither revert, nor make >> it optional". >> > > The "not make it an option" part is the part I just don't get. > > Don't bother explaining, I just ... don't ... "get" it. (Or maybe I do and > just fundamentally disagree.)
Pardon? The point of the mailing list is that people exchange opinions and ask questions to be answered. If people start saying things like "Here is my opinion and I don't want to hear no explanations", won't it be more like a guestbook or a shoutbox? Fundamentally disagreeing is perfectly OK. As a user, you don't have to know about all the technical complications that come with behaviour options. Albeit you might have an idea about UX complications. The fun part is that it's already has been explained in a similar thread over at gimp-developer@. Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
